|
Data Center Information Page
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
William Slater
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BSDI FAQ vs. Montana Data Center Resistance Group - Key Issues Comparison
BSDI FAQ vs. Montana Data Center Resistance Group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Topic |
BSDI View |
Montana Data Center Resistance Counter-Point |
|
Power Supply |
Project will add new generation, batteries and 'pay its own way' to avoid raising existing customers' electricity costs. |
Independent review should verify assumptions. Large new loads may still require transmission upgrades, operational changes, or future capacity additions. Residents may seek enforceable guarantees and long-term monitoring. |
|
Water Use |
Company states facilities are designed to minimize water use and recent designs use water only for domestic purposes rather than cooling. |
Community may request legally binding water-use limits, drought contingency plans, groundwater monitoring, and independent verification over the project's lifetime. |
|
Electricity Costs |
BSDI says ratepayers will not subsidize project power and new generation protects customers. |
Opponents may question indirect cost recovery, transmission expenses, future utility investments, and whether commitments remain enforceable if the project expands. |
|
Environment |
Renewables, batteries and modern design reduce environmental footprint. |
Construction, land conversion, wildlife habitat, visual impacts, emissions from backup generators, and cumulative regional impacts deserve full environmental review. |
|
Economic Benefits |
Construction jobs, permanent technical jobs, tax revenue and local business growth. |
Residents may ask how many permanent local jobs will exist, wage levels, tax abatements, and whether public incentives exceed public benefits. |
|
Land Use |
Large campus on privately owned land near infrastructure. |
Community may seek stronger local land-use controls, setbacks, buffering, and preservation of agricultural and rural character. |
|
Transparency |
Company states commitment to community engagement. |
Residents may request public disclosure of water, power, noise, emissions, emergency plans, and regular independent reporting. |
|
Quality of Life |
Modern campus intended to coexist with local communities. |
Potential concerns include traffic, construction disruption, noise, lighting, industrialization of rural landscapes, and property values. |
|
Infrastructure |
Investment in fiber, transmission and regional infrastructure. |
Community may ask who pays for supporting roads, emergency services, utilities and long-term maintenance. |
|
Community Voice |
BSDI emphasizes local partnerships and Montana-first approach. |
Residents may request binding community benefit agreements, stronger local decision-making authority, and meaningful opportunities to influence project approvals. |
Download Full Document in PDF Format
Top 500 American Data Centers - Current and Planned ( Click Here )
( To return to this page, click the back button after reviewing each image )
Big Commercial Vendor Data Center Companies
( To return to this page, click the back button after reviewing each image )
Data Centers in America
( To return to this page, click the back button after reviewing each image )
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida &
Florida Detail
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington, D.C.
Washington State
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Puerto Rico
Data Centers in Other Countries
( To return to this page, click the back button after reviewing each image )
Albania
Argentina
Australia
Bangladesh
Belarus ( See Russia )
Belgium
Brazil
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Canada
Chile
China
Colombia
Croatia
Denmark
Egypt
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Latvia
Lithuania
Malaysia
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nigeria
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Serbia
Singapore
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Thailand
Türkiye
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom
Venezuela
Vietnam
Other Data Center Resistance News


William F. Slater, III
Slater Technologies, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois
United States of America
Last updated: Tuesday, July 21, 2026 01:09:26 AM