|
Montana Data Center Resistance Page YELLOWSTONE COUNTY CITIZENS' INITIATIVE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ms. Kassi Solberg
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Montana Data Center Projects
BSDI FAQ vs. Montana Data Center Resistance Group - Key Issues Comparison
BSDI FAQ vs. Montana Data Center Resistance Group
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Topic |
BSDI View |
Montana Data Center Resistance Counter-Point |
|
Power Supply |
Project will add new generation, batteries and 'pay its own way' to avoid raising existing customers' electricity costs. |
Independent review should verify assumptions. Large new loads may still require transmission upgrades, operational changes, or future capacity additions. Residents may seek enforceable guarantees and long-term monitoring. |
|
Water Use |
Company states facilities are designed to minimize water use and recent designs use water only for domestic purposes rather than cooling. |
Community may request legally binding water-use limits, drought contingency plans, groundwater monitoring, and independent verification over the project's lifetime. |
|
Electricity Costs |
BSDI says ratepayers will not subsidize project power and new generation protects customers. |
Opponents may question indirect cost recovery, transmission expenses, future utility investments, and whether commitments remain enforceable if the project expands. |
|
Environment |
Renewables, batteries and modern design reduce environmental footprint. |
Construction, land conversion, wildlife habitat, visual impacts, emissions from backup generators, and cumulative regional impacts deserve full environmental review. |
|
Economic Benefits |
Construction jobs, permanent technical jobs, tax revenue and local business growth. |
Residents may ask how many permanent local jobs will exist, wage levels, tax abatements, and whether public incentives exceed public benefits. |
|
Land Use |
Large campus on privately owned land near infrastructure. |
Community may seek stronger local land-use controls, setbacks, buffering, and preservation of agricultural and rural character. |
|
Transparency |
Company states commitment to community engagement. |
Residents may request public disclosure of water, power, noise, emissions, emergency plans, and regular independent reporting. |
|
Quality of Life |
Modern campus intended to coexist with local communities. |
Potential concerns include traffic, construction disruption, noise, lighting, industrialization of rural landscapes, and property values. |
|
Infrastructure |
Investment in fiber, transmission and regional infrastructure. |
Community may ask who pays for supporting roads, emergency services, utilities and long-term maintenance. |
|
Community Voice |
BSDI emphasizes local partnerships and Montana-first approach. |
Residents may request binding community benefit agreements, stronger local decision-making authority, and meaningful opportunities to influence project approvals. |
Download Full Document in PDF Format
Yellowstone County Commissioners

Petition Signature Progress
( As of July 15, 2026 )

Big Sky Digital Infrastructure

Other Data Center Resistance News


William F. Slater, III
Slater Technologies, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois
United States of America
Last updated: Wednesday, July 15, 2026 08:15:41 PM